Armed Rochester Homeowner Fatally Shoots Paroled Burglar, Police Say

By AmmoLand Editor Duncan Johnson
The pistol and 9mm ammunition pictured are a stock image and were not identified as those used in the incident. iStock-944927264
Police say a legally armed Rochester homeowner fatally shot a suspected burglar who entered his residence before dawn. iStock-944927264

A Rochester, New York, homeowner reportedly awakened before dawn to the sound of someone breaking into his house. By the time police arrived, the suspected burglar was dead in the kitchen—and the homeowner was ready to cooperate with investigators.

According to reports, the Rochester Police Department officers responded to a home on Avery Street at approximately 4:30 a.m. on August 3. A neighbor initially called 911 after hearing gunshots. The homeowner then called and reported that he had shot someone who broke into his residence.

Police found the intruder inside the kitchen and pronounced him dead at the scene.

Police Say Shooting “Appears to Be Justified”

Rochester Police Capt. Frank Umbrino said the suspected burglar entered through the rear of the house. Investigators do not believe the homeowner and intruder knew one another.

The homeowner possessed a valid New York pistol permit and reportedly used a legally owned and registered handgun. Police did not arrest him, and Umbrino said the shooting “appears to be justified.”

His advice for anyone considering a similar crime was considerably less complicated than New York’s firearm laws.

“My message is don’t break into houses,” Umbrino said.

Police also revealed that the dead man was on parole for a previous burglary conviction. The Avery Street home had reportedly been burglarized at least twice since June, while neighbors told investigators that other houses in the area had also recently been targeted.

Authorities had not released the suspected burglar’s identity at the time of the initial reports.

The Criminal-Justice System Failed Before the Gun Owner Acted

This case presents a familiar contrast. New York required the homeowner to obtain government permission before acquiring and possessing the handgun he used to defend himself. The firearm had to be registered, and the owner had to navigate one of the most restrictive handgun-licensing systems in the country.

The suspected burglar, meanwhile, was already known to the criminal-justice system and had been released on parole after a previous burglary conviction.

The state’s licensing bureaucracy did not stop the break-in. Parole supervision apparently did not stop it, either. When someone allegedly entered an occupied home before dawn, the only person immediately available to protect the occupants was the armed citizen already inside.

That is why the right to keep and bear arms cannot depend on whether government officials believe a particular person has demonstrated enough “need” to exercise it.

The Right of Self-Defense Predates New York’s Permission Slip

The Second Amendment did not create the right to armed self-defense, nor did New York confer that right by issuing this homeowner a pistol permit. The Constitution protects a pre-existing right belonging to the people.

In District of Columbia v. Heller, the Supreme Court recognized defense of the home as central to the Second Amendment. A firearm locked away at a police station, or tied up behind months of applications, interviews and administrative delays, cannot protect a person or family when someone crashes through the back door at 4:30 in the morning.

The publicly available reports do not explain whether the intruder was armed or describe every movement preceding the shooting. The final legal determination belongs to investigators and prosecutors. What police have said, however, points strongly toward a lawful defensive gun use: an unknown man allegedly broke into an occupied home, was confronted inside the kitchen, and was shot by a cooperating, legally armed homeowner.

Gun-control advocates often treat armed citizens as a danger that must be managed. Rochester’s experience offers the opposite lesson.

The repeat burglar was not stopped by a permit requirement, a gun registry or the parole system. He was stopped by a homeowner who had the means to defend his home when the government was not there.


About Duncan Johnson:

Duncan Johnson is a lifelong firearms enthusiast and unwavering defender of the Second Amendment—where “shall not be infringed” means exactly what it says. A graduate of George Mason University, he enjoys competing in local USPSA and multi-gun competitions whenever he’s not covering the latest in gun rights and firearm policy. Duncan is a regular contributor to AmmoLand News and serves as part of the editorial team responsible for AmmoLand’s daily gun-rights reporting and industry coverage.Duncan Johnson