The Dueling Roots of the Old West Gunfighter

The lone gunman squaring off in a dusty street, hand hovering over a low-slung holster, is one of the most durable images in American gear culture. Its origin lies not on the frontier but in the East, in a formal ritual imported from Europe and practiced for decades by prominent men in the young republic. Before there were gunfighters, there were duelists, and the code that governed how gentlemen settled their disputes with pistols shaped the fights that later played out across the West.

To trace where gunfighters came from, start with the duel. The fast-draw contests later dramatized in Western films trace their inspiration to accounts of duels and gunfights that used the quick draw during the frontier era, a formalized way for gentlemen to settle disputes with swords or guns that came out of European chivalry. But those frontier fights themselves grew out of a much older practice that Americans inherited and made their own.

Where Dueling Came From

Dueling was an import, like many early American customs. Starting in the Middle Ages, European nobles settled matters of honor in man-to-man combat. An early form was known as “judicial combat,” so called because God supposedly sided with the man in the right and gave him the victory. In an era full of bloody encounters, these combats probably kept men from killing on impulse. Heads of state and the Catholic Church repeatedly banned the practice, with little effect.

In 1777, a group of Irishmen set down the rules of dueling in a document called the Code Duello. It contained twenty-six rules covering every aspect of the duel, from the hours a man could receive a challenge to the number of shots or wounds needed to satisfy honor. An Americanized version, written by South Carolina Governor John Lyde Wilson, appeared in 1838. Before that, Americans made do with European rules. The origin and authenticity of the Code Duello are questioned, but several dueling manuals appeared in the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries, and the Wilson Code laid out how the practice should be run in the United States.

What the Duel Was Actually For

Dueling was about honor. The practice grew from a gentleman’s desire to remedy a real or perceived insult. Many held that dying honorably in a duel was preferable to living without honor. Sometimes honor could be upheld simply by showing a willingness to face death, but a duel was fought to gain satisfaction, and it could be deadly.

The ritual was reserved for gentlemen, because only such men were thought to have honor. It was considered inappropriate for people of unequal rank to duel. When a challenge came from a man of lower class, a gentleman could disregard it or answer by caning or cowhiding the offender. As practiced in America, though, dueling sometimes reached other social classes, and some of the established protocols loosened along the way.

The mechanics followed a strict script. Each party acted through a “second,” and the second’s first job was to try to reconcile the two men without violence. An offended party issued his challenge through this second. An apology from the recipient usually closed the matter. If he chose to fight, he selected the weapons, the time, and the place. Apologies could be given up until combat began, and once fighting started the affair could be halted once honor was satisfied. Many honor disputes, called “affairs of honor,” were settled through negotiation before anyone reached the field.

Who Dueled, and With What

Men of every station fought duels, yet a great many of the young nation’s leading figures answered insults on the dueling ground. Most duelists chose guns. The large-caliber, smoothbore flintlock pistols that many American men owned in pairs typified the weapons of the era, and from about 1750 to 1850 many men were called to use them.

Death in a pistol duel was in fact fairly unlikely. Flintlocks often misfired, and accuracy was difficult even for an experienced shooter. Pistols generally had to be discharged within three seconds, because taking longer to aim was considered dishonorable. The heyday of dueling in America ran between 1750 and 1850, and it was far more common in the South, where an affront to honor was taken as a serious matter, than in New England, where it was viewed as a cultural throwback.

The Duels That Mattered

The most famous duel in American history killed a Founder. On July 11, 1804, Vice President Aaron Burr and former Treasury Secretary Alexander Hamilton met at Weehawken, New Jersey. Hamilton’s shot went high, perhaps deliberately. Burr’s shot struck Hamilton in the belly, tore through his liver, and came to rest in his spine. Hamilton died the next day. By 1804 the practice was an American fixture, so what shook the nation was who had been killed, not the duel itself.

When politicians lost elections, they sometimes provoked duels to redeem their reputations and prove themselves worthy leaders. Between 1795 and 1807, New York City alone saw sixteen affairs of honor, most of them arising from elections. Eleven of those sixteen were settled through negotiation. Many political duelists did not want to kill their opponents; the aim was to show a man ready to die for his honor. Burr was charged with murder in two states and, as the sitting Vice President, ran to South Carolina and dropped out of sight.

Andrew Jackson has long been tied to dueling, but his record as a duelist has been greatly exaggerated. He had a temper, issued challenges, and served as a second, but only two encounters counted as true duels, and only one ended in shots striking flesh. In 1806, after a quarrel over a horse race turned into a public exchange of insults touching his wife Rachel, Jackson faced the marksman Charles Dickinson. Dickinson fired first and wounded Jackson in the chest. Jackson stayed on his feet, then took deliberate aim and killed Dickinson. Jackson’s political opponents judged that cold second shot to be little more than murder, and the affair tarnished his reputation. Abraham Lincoln, for his part, narrowly avoided a sword fight by apologizing to an Illinois official he had ridiculed in a newspaper.

From the Field of Honor to the Frontier

The one-on-one pistol duel did not vanish when dueling fell out of favor around the Civil War, when most Americans came to view it as murder. It moved west and changed form. Historical Western duels were a crude version of the Southern duel, and several genuine quick-draw contests took place, including the Hickok–Tutt Shootout and the Short–Courtright Duel. In these fights, the man who could draw, fire, and hit first usually won, though accuracy and calmness often mattered more.

Yet most Old West violence was spontaneous, driven by alcohol or heated quarrels rather than formal challenges. The gunfighter who emerged from this world could be a lawman, an outlaw, a cowboy, or a hired gun, and the reputations of men like Wyatt Earp and Billy the Kid grew with each retelling. To place the modern fast-draw sport or the Western myth in context, trace it past the frontier back to the field of honor, where the pistol first became the accepted tool for settling a man’s good name.

The post The Dueling Roots of the Old West Gunfighter appeared first on AllOutdoor.com.