Four FFLs reportedly passed ATF inspections after 4473-only suppressor transfers, August gun sales rose for a seventh straight month, and the Third Circuit revived NSSF's challenge to New Jersey's gun industry liability law.
A Memphis man beaten by two intruders in a Frayser apartment wrestled a gun away from one of them and shot him. The other is now charged. Read the original story: Memphis Man Attacked at Home By Two Men Wrestles Gun Away From Intruder Who Said ‘Watch This,’ Then Shoots Him
Eight real-world defensive gun uses reveal critical lessons about home defense, intervention, escalation, self-defense law, and making good decisions under pressure.
San Jose charges $1,591 in city fees for a new concealed carry permit. The DOJ is now threatening a federal lawsuit unless the city changes course. The post DOJ Targets San Jose Over Carry Permit Cost appeared first on The Truth About Guns.
Natchez police say a man was shot in the chest after allegedly forcing his way into a residence during a domestic dispute Tuesday. Read the original story: Man Shot in the Chest After Allegedly Forcing His Way Into a Natchez Residence During Domestic Dispute, Police Say
Michigan accepted that 19-year-old Martinez Long lawfully stopped an armed mall attacker. It still sentenced him to two years of probation for carrying the pistol that allowed him to intervene.
Mobile police say a man broke into a home through a window around 9:15 at night and the homeowner shot and killed him. Here is what MPD confirmed. Read the original story: Mobile Homeowner Shoots and Kills Man Who Broke In Through a Window at 9:15 at Night, Police Say
Jordan “Dugan Ashley” Derrick faces federal charges over explosives content posted online. The bigger question is where protected technical speech ends and criminal facilitation begins. The post The First Amendment Fight Inside the Dugan Ashley Explosives Case appeared first on The Truth Abou...
Federal prosecutors tied Dugan Ashley to the New Orleans terrorist through downloaded videos. AmmoLand’s source says the evidence shows no messages, meeting or personal connection—and raises questions about whether the published information would have worked.